Education Category Archives

June 11, 2005

No Child Left Behind: Current Criticism | By Ben

A post to the Interesting People mailing list highlighted this editorial by a Wyoming teacher in the Casper Star Tribune.

This criticism echoes similar concerns that we've discussed in our Lone Star Democracy meetings. "No Child Left Behind" has unrealistic standards, it emphasizes testing over learning, and it is underfunded. This also adds a useful point: this act holds teachers accountable for results that aren't completely in their control, since success requires cooperation from students and parents. I think this is due to the GOP's view of the world as a top-down corporation, rather than as a group of communities where you need to share a common goal among disparate stakeholders. To quote:

Because no lawmaker wants to try to enact a piece of legislation that would hold parents accountable for their child's achievement in school, the law was passed that made the educators solely accountable. This isn't fair and it isn't realistic. Education needs to be seen as a table with four legs: teachers, school administrators, parents and students. If any one of these legs doesn't hold up its weight, the table will fall over and there won't be a flat surface for the education to build on.

June 7, 2005

Might have to rethink school vouchers | By GlennM

Tierney has a piece in today's NYTimes about the Florida Supreme Court case on school vouchers.

Continue reading "Might have to rethink school vouchers" »

June 5, 2005

No Child Left Behind? | By Ben

A thought from lunch: maybe the true meaning of "No Child Left Behind" isn't helping kids in need do better, but instead it's about keeping everyone else in the public school system from doing well. You can't be left behind if no one's moving.

December 31, 2004

Making school and students useful | By GlennM

It was interesting to finally read the first essay in "Hackers and Painters" after just visiting the Boy Scout Museum in Dallas. One of the things that struck me heavily in the Scout museum was how much the scouts were proud to have done their part to support WWI and WWII, filling in for the adults that were overseas or otherwise busy with the war effort. Recycling efforts, victory gardens, selling libery bonds -- they had a purpose.

Very different than our "civilian sacrifice-free" wars of today (not totally fair to those affected by the absence by the full-time soldiers and the reserves, but mostly so).

And very dfferent from our "keep them out of the way" educational system described in H&P.

In thinking of improving our educational system, it seems like it's got to include ways for students to create value. What if students were asked to help build/maintain schools and parks, balance the municipal budget, etc? Give them applied uses for the math, science, and english we teach at those levels, and interest has got to rise. I'm starting to have more respect for Clinton's Americorps, which seemed good but a little tertiary at the time.